Discussion on the systematic position of the Early Cambrian priapulomorph worms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Priapulid 蠕虫在今日的环境形成一扇小海洋的门与仅仅， 18 描述了种，但是他们是在 endobenthic 社区的最丰富的动物寒武纪。他们很好特别地在更低的寒武纪的 Maotianshan 页岩 ofChina~ 被代表([1-3 ]) 并且 Canada~ 的中间的寒武纪的伯吉斯页岩([4 ]) 。从 the530 妈旧 Maotianshan 页岩的 priapulid 蠕虫可以被放在 6 碱基以内：selkirkiid， corynetid， anning 标志， palaeoscolecidan， tylotitid 和 priapuliid~([5 ]) 。另外，另一扇重要 endobenthic 蠕虫门， Sipuncula 也从 Maotianshan 页岩 ~ 被报导了([6 ]) 。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".