Entre presse et littérature : le journalisme féminin durant les décennies 30 et 40 au Québec1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec, des études récentes ont montré que l’écriture dans les périodiques a servi de tremplin à la carrière littéraire féminine, comme c’est le cas chez Robertine Barry et Germaine Guèvremont. Toutefois, aucune recherche n’a poursuivi l’analyse de l’articulation entre le littéraire et le médiatique chez les femmes journalistes au moment où s’amorce véritablement, en France et au Québec, la professionnalisation du journalisme au cours des années 30. L’auteure cherche donc à examiner la manière dont se reconfigure le maillage entre presse et littérature après 1930, en s’appuyant sur la trajectoire et la production de Germaine Bernier, Renaude Lapointe et Germaine Bundock. Elle postule en effet qu’à partir des années 30 les rapports entre la presse et la littérature se maintiennent, mais se déclinent différemment par le truchement de postures, de poétiques et de genres médiatiques distincts qui empruntent tantôt aux pratiques du XIXe siècle, tantôt à des pratiques journalistiques plus modernes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".