MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3140991066

Integrated watershed management: evolution, development and emerging trends

2016· article· en· W3140991066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guangyu, Wang, Shari, Mang, Haisheng, Cai, Shirong, Liu, Zhiqiang, Zhang, Liguo, John 

Bibliographic record

Venue林业研究:英文版 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWatershed managementWatershedEnvironmental resource managementResource management (computing)Adaptive managementEcosystem managementBusinessGovernment (linguistics)Environmental planningSustainable developmentSustainable managementSustainabilityGeographyEcologyComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceEcosystem
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Watershed management is an ever-evolving practice involving the management of land,water,biota,and other resources in a defined area for ecological,social,and economic purposes.In this paper,we explore the following questions:How has watershed management evolved? What new tools are available and how can they be integrated into sustainable watershed management? To address these questions,we discuss the process of developing integrated watershed management strategies for sustainable management through the incorporation of adaptive management techniques and traditional ecological knowledge.We address the numerous benefits from integration across disciplines and jurisdictional boundaries,as well as the incorporation of technological advancements,such as remote sensing,GIS,big data,and multi-level social-ecological systems analysis,into watershed management strategies.We use three case studies from China,Europe,and Canada to review the success and failure of integrated watershed management in addressing different ecological,social,and economic dilemmas in geographically diverse locations.Although progress has been made in watershed management strategies,there are still numerous issues impeding successful management outcomes;many of which can be remedied through holistic management approaches,incorporation of cutting-edge science and technology,and cross-jurisdictional coordination.We conclude by highlighting that future watershed management will need to account for climate change impacts by employing technological advancements and holistic,cross-disciplinary approaches to ensure watersheds continue to serve their ecological,social,and economic functions.We present three case studies in this paper as a valuable resource for scientists,resource managers,government agencies,and other stakeholders aiming to improve integrated watershed management strategies and more efficiently and successfully achieve ecological and socio-economic management objectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue林业研究:英文版Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207