Substrate selection and seasonal variation in abundance and size composition of isopod Lirceus fontinalis in Ontario streams, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
溪流等足目动物 Lirceus 的丰富和颗粒组成生长在水源或泉水我们到在 3 的 2002 年 8 月的从 2001 年 4 月的 reinvestigated 在南部的安大略流，当前的速度的 Canada.Effects 被选择慢廉免除分析。等足目动物的底层，丰富上的季节和水深度，分发和颗粒组成的效果被分析。它被发现那底层和季节影响等足目动物大多数。有依附的细丝状的宏水藻的岩石底层包含等足目动物丰富 7.05 次光秃秃的岩石底层和 14.6 次的的好沙并且泥底层。关于在等足目动物的丰富和颗粒组成的 seasonality 有一个大变化，与发生在夏天的最高的丰富并且在冬季和春天最低；单个等足目动物也趋于在冬季和春天更大。在所有底层，浅区域趋于比更深的区域支持等足目动物的更高的密度。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".