Bibliographic record
Abstract
The International Baccalaureate organisation (IB), with headquarters based in Geneva, Switzerland continues a world-wide expansion of their three educational programmes. An understanding of, and involvement with the programmes to support the school community is vital for the school librarian in those school which are considering adoption of any of the programmes. The three IB programmes encompassing teaching and learning from 3 years to 19 years are:- the Primary Years programme ( PYP); Middle Years Programme (MYP); and the Diploma Programme ( DP). The IB “Standards and Practices” guide the Authorisation process for IB World Schools and these in turn can effect and direct the way libraries and librarians are used. The IB mission statement, the IB Learner Profile and programme specific documentation guide a ‘continuum of international education’ being promoted by IB World Schools. Some aspects of these areas will be explored in the context of possible changes for the school librarian. ‘What is in it for me?’ will be answered through challenging school librarians to become part of a whole school learning initiative based on International Baccalaureate principles of inquiry and internationalism, and to possibly rethink their role through developing collaborative practices in their educational institution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".