MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3141056651 · doi:10.1109/mwsym.2011.5972967

Detecting buried objects with subwavelength resolution using a near-field antenna-array probe

2011· article· en· W3141056651 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2011 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNear-Field Optical Microscopy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsDielectricWavelengthAntenna (radio)Dipole antennaReflection coefficientNear and far fieldResolution (logic)DipoleMaterials scienceImage resolutionReflection (computer programming)Antenna arrayPhysicsOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A near-field antenna-array probe is used to perform subwavelength imaging on objects buried a quarter-wavelength beneath the surface of a dielectric slab. Short passive dipole objects are detected by monitoring the input reflection coefficient of the probe as it is scanned over the dielectric. Experimental measurements are presented that verify the subwavelength imaging behavior. A minimum resolvable separation between two objects in terms of dielectric wavelengths was measured to be 0:295λ at a distance of λ/4, compared to 0:639λ for a single monopole probe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it