Whole exome sequencing reveals putatively novel associations in retinopathies and drusen formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) affect 1 in 3000 individuals worldwide and are genetically heterogeneous, with over 270 identified genes and loci; however, there are still many identified disorders with no current genetic etiology. Whole exome sequencing (WES) provides a hypothesis-free first examination of IRD patients in either a clinical or research setting to identify the genetic cause of disease. We present a study of IRD in ten families from Alberta, Canada, through the lens of novel gene discovery. We identify the genetic etiology of IRDs in three of the families to be variants in known disease-associated genes, previously missed by clinical investigations. In addition, we identify two potentially novel associations: LRP1 in early-onset drusen formation and UBE2U in a multi-system condition presenting with retinoschisis, cataracts, learning disabilities, and developmental delay. We also describe interesting results in our unsolved cases to provide further information to other investigators of these blinding conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".