MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3141196923 · doi:10.20961/shes.v3i2.46564

The Utilization Interactive Digital Media Comic In Indonesian Historical Learning to Support Independet Learning at SMA Al-Izzah

2020· article· en· W3141196923 on OpenAlexaff
Moch. Dimas Galuh Mahardika, Nur Wahyu Putra

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Humanities and Educational Studies (SHEs) Conference Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndonesianComicsClass (philosophy)Mathematics educationDigital mediaMultimediaSociologyPsychologyPedagogyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of technology in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 has a comprehensive impact into aspects of life, one of which is in the learning of history. The use of electronic media for historical learning needs has begun to be encouraged in various schools. Conventional historical learning is usually still one-way, or in other words still teaching oriented. Thus with the development of technology and to meet the needs of the times, learning media needs to be used in order to improve the quality of learning. In addition, with the use of learning media, it is expected that students have an interest in participating more in historical learning. This research tries to review the use of digital comic learning media in the subjects of Indonesian History in class X- MIA 3 senior high school Al-Izzah Kota Batu. The research method used a descriptive qualitative method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Humanities and Educational Studies (SHEs) Conference SeriesSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207