MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3141391356

Lignin Precipitation in Auto-catalyzed Ethanol Pulping Studied by XPS and AFM

2009· article· en· W3141391356 on OpenAlexaff
Kecheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of China Pulp and Paper · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLigninPulp (tooth)CelluloseChemistryStrawX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyFiberEthanol precipitationChemical engineeringChemical compositionEthanolKappa numberMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryComposite materialKraft processInorganic chemistryKraft paper
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphological characteristics,chemical composition and lignin distribution on the fiber surfaces of auto-catalyzed ethanol pulp were studied.The results obtained from the observation of AFM showed that lignin particles completely cover on the un-washed fiber surfaces,the amount and size of the lignin particles covered on the fiber surfaces become less and small in washing process.The fibrillar structure can be observed clearly but there still are lignin particles on the fiber surfaces after four-stage washing.It was found that lignin particles on the fiber surface look like globule due to the interaction between lignin molecules.XPS analyses results indicated that O/C ratio of ethanol wheat straw pulp fiber surface is higher than the theoretical O/C ratio of cellulose and close to the theoretical O/C ratio of lignin,and it proves there is lignin on the fiber surface.Kappa number measurement suggested high kappa number of ethanol pulp is mainly due to the precipitation of the dissolved lignin from the pulping liquor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of China Pulp and PaperSame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207