HOW TO STOP SHARK FIN CONSUMPTION IN CHINA―LEGAL AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the Chinese consumption history of shark fin can be traced to 1,000 years ago, it was associated with nobilities, and had nothing to do with the ordinary people. In recent 100 years, shark fin starts to enter into daily life. The consumption areas in China are mainly concentrated in the coastal areas of Guangdong province. It is a bad catering culture criticized by many Chinese people since it appeared. It was almost extinct during Maoist Era. After the reform and opening-up, some Chinese people get rich quickly which led to extravagant consumption. Recent years, mainstream sounds of Chinese society opposed the consumption of shark fin, more and more media, restaurants, and local governments have refused to the consumption of shark fin. What Chinese society should do now is to have a comprehensive ban on shark fin in the area of legislation, law enforcement and administration of justice. A lot of work need to be done on it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it