MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3141529657 · doi:10.4021/jh28w

Thrombocytopenia in Adults: Review Article

2012· article· en· W3141529657 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erkurt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thrombocytopenia is the result of falling the number of platelet from 150,000/mi croL . There are three main reasons of thrombocytopenia, a-Decreasing of making platelet b-Increasing of destruction platelet c-Changing of distribution platelet. Pseudothrombocytopenia must be kept in mind too. Both hereditary and acquired reasons help thrombocytopenia have wide spreaded, but acquired causes are more common with increasing age. Thrombocytopenia separates three stages as numerical. Mild: 100,000 - 150,000/mi croL , Moderate: 50,000 - 100,000/mi croL . Severe: < 50,000/mi croL . However, thrombocytopenia is not usually detected clinically until the platelet count has fallen to levels below 100,000/mi croL . Severe thrombocytopenia, such as intracerebral and intra-abdominal bleeding may be life threatening . So diagnosing the treatment immediately can save the life. Transfusion of platelet may not need in all thrombocytopenias. Treatment of the underlying disease may be sufficient . The reason of thrombocytopenia can be temporary but also can be caused severe diseases. Causes of thrombocytopenia change development levels of countries, according to geographical distribution and application centers. In this review we emphasize common etiologies seen in adult patients with thrombocytopenia. doi:10.4021/jh28w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hematology→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→