MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Waste Management, Radioactive

2021· other· en· W3141662965 on OpenAlexaff
B.M. Ikeda

Bibliographic record

VenueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioactive wasteWaste managementHazardHealth hazardHuman healthEnvironmental scienceHigh-level wasteRadiation exposureEngineeringChemistryEnvironmental healthNuclear medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Radioactive waste consists of items and materials that are no longer useful and contain harmful amounts of radioactive material. The waste could emit α‐, β‐, γ‐radiation, or any combination of these types of radiation. If the concentration of radioactive elements is high enough, contact with the waste could be detrimental to human health and a danger to the environment. To help identify the hazard, radioactive waste is classified as high, intermediate, and low level waste, depending on the concentration of radioactive species and the half‐life of those species. High level radioactive waste poses the greatest hazard, while low level presents the smallest hazard. In this article, the types of wastes and examples of the waste are described, some of the important principles for managing the waste are noted, and the general methods for minimizing the hazard to human health and the environment while storing and disposing of the waste are explained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical TechnologySame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207