La règle de l’épuisement des voies de recours internes devant les juridictions internationales : le cas de la Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La règle de l’épuisement des voies de recours internes est une règle coutumière de droit international procédural, que l’on retrouve particulièrement en matière de protection diplomatique, en matière d’arbitrage international, mais aussi dans le contentieux international des droits de la personne. La Cour africaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples, plus jeune juridiction internationale de protection des droits de l’homme, a développé une jurisprudence quantitativement importante, dans laquelle elle interprète la règle de l’épuisement des voies de recours internes. Dans le présent texte, l’auteur analyse l’approche élaborée par la Cour africaine afin de voir, d’une part, dans quelle mesure elle s’éloigne des approches traditionnelles et, d’autre part, si elle est prompte à promouvoir l’accès des particuliers au prétoire du juge international africain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".