MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3141780075 · doi:10.18280/mmep.080118

Performance Investigation of Flat Plate and Evacuated Tube Collectors under Jordan Climate Conditions Using TRNSYS Software

2021· article· en· W3141780075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRNSYSEnvironmental scienceInletCold climateCold winterMeteorologyThermalClimatologyEngineeringGeologyMechanical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of the Flat Plate Collector (FPC) and Evacuated Tube Collector (ETC) for domestic hot water applications under Jordan climate conditions was theoretically investigated using TRNSYS software. The presented simulation model can provide a long-term evaluation of system performance at different weather conditions. This simulation was carried out during 24 hours in 21 June, is considered as a hot climate and 21 January is considered as a cold climate; under the meteorological conditions of both Irbid and Aqaba cities in Jordan. The inlet water temperature of the first collector, collector area, water flow rate and tilt angle were considered 15℃, 2.04 m2, 0.0139 kg/s and 45 degrees respectively. The outlet temperature of each collector was considered as the inlet of the previous collector. Three collectors in series were applied to increase the output temperature up to 90-100℃. The results showed that TE increased with the decrease in the inlet temperature, which means the useful energy gain (Qu) of the first collector is greater than the 2nd and the 3rdcollector. The useful energy gain (Qu) of ETC is greater than of FPC, and the useful energy gain (Qu) of cold climate is less than hot climate. The output temperature of ETCs is greater than that of FPCs for Irbid city in cold and hot climate. Furthermore, for Aqaba in cold climate and in hot climate the outlet temperature of ETCs is higher than FPCs. Additionally, the daily thermal performance of the ETCs is significantly better than the FPCs in cold climate. Meanwhile, thermal performance of both collectors are close in a hot climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it