MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Overview of Noise-Vibration-Harshness Analysis for Induction Machines and Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines

2020· article· en· W3141960850 on OpenAlexaff
Pengzhao Song, Wenlong Li, Shruthi Mukundan, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise, vibration, and harshnessHarshnessMultiphysicsModal analysisVibrationNoise (video)Computer scienceEngineeringAcousticsAutomotive engineeringFinite element methodPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noise-vibration-harshness (NVH) analysis is becoming increasingly important to comprehensively understand, identify, and mitigate the vibration and noise of the electric machines. NVH analysis can also be used for the diagnosis of design defects and mechanical problems. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of modeling and analysis of NVH for induction machines (IMs) and permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) available in existing literature. The major components involved in NVH analysis are the electromagnetic force calculation, modal analysis, and multiphysics model based NVH synthesis, which will be thoroughly reviewed. Electromagnetic force calculation is vital to the overall analysis since the corresponding forces are the main source resulting in vibration and acoustic noise. Then, approaches for the modal analysis are reviewed to obtain the inherent characteristic of the machine structure and are used for solving the vibration problems. Subsequently, a multiphysics model based NVH analysis is established to evaluate the vibration and noise of electric motors. The synthesis integrates the electromagnetic, structural and acoustic radiation models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207