Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quebec in mind paints a striking portrait of the province of Quebec in an 80 page photo album that will enchant all lovers of La Belle Province! This great book of beautiful photographic images with a sleek design makes for an ideal gift to friends, tourists, clients or business associates visiting or planning to visit Quebec, as well as the perfect souvenir to bring back home. More than only a souvenir booklet, Quebec in mind is grouped by theme and accompanied by informative captions and descriptions; the gorgeous illustrations will bring you under the spell of the beautiful Quebec landscape as you discover the unique spirit of this vast region and its many faces: Its major attractions, Montreal and Quebec City, the St. Lawrence River Valley and its gulf, and the vast Far North Its rich architectural heritage, traditional, religious, and contemporary. Its culture and savoir-vivre, the warmth and hospitality of its people, its unique cuisine and its many outdoor activities Its wilderness and wide open spaces, from the countryside to the forests, from the lakes to the mountains, from the river to the sea. A magnificent book on Quebec to offer yourself or as a gift for a friend!
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".