The genus<i>Semiorbis</i>(Eunotiaceae, Bacillariophyta) in North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genus Semiorbis was erected by R.M.Patrick in 1966 as monotypic based on the relatively rare taxon Semiorbis hemicyclus. Defining characters for Semiorbis include strongly arcuate valves, short eunotioid raphe branches, well-developed external costae with spine-like projections on the virgae, lack of rimoportulae, and a broader dorsal mantle. New populations of Semiorbis were found in the central USA (Wisconsin) on Outer Island, Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, along southeast Lake Superior, from a lake in New Jersey (USA), and from a small arctic lake in Nunavut, Canada. The population in Outer Lagoon, a shallow embayment cut off from Lake Superior by a long-shore bar, provided documentation of living cells and colonies of Semiorbis. We examined the morphology, ecology, and taxonomy of these new populations using light and scanning electron microscopy, traditional morphometrics, and sliding landmarks shape analysis. We compared these populations to European populations of Semiorbis hemicyclus and North American populations of Semiorbis rotundus and Semiorbis catillifera. We determined that the population found in Wisconsin represents a new species herein described as Semiorbis eliasiae Edlund, D.R.L.Burge, N.A.Andresen & VanderMeulen sp. nov., the New Jersey (USA) population is Semiorbis rotundus, and the Nunavut (Canada) population represents a North American population of the generitype Semiorbis hemicyclus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".