SPAER: Sparse Deep Convolutional Autoencoder Model to Extract Low Dimensional Imaging Biomarkers for Early Detection of Breast Cancer Using Dynamic Thermography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early diagnosis of breast cancer unequivocally improves the survival rate of patients and is crucial for disease treatment. With the current developments in infrared imaging, breast screening using dynamic thermography seems to be a great complementary method for clinical breast examination (CBE) prior to mammography. In this study, we propose a sparse deep convolutional autoencoder model named SPAER to extract low-dimensional deep thermomics to aid breast cancer diagnosis. The model receives multichannel, low-rank, approximated thermal bases as input images. SPAER provides a solution for high-dimensional deep learning features and selects the predominant basis matrix using matrix factorization techniques. The model has been evaluated using five state-of-the-art matrix factorization methods and 208 thermal breast cancer screening cases. The best accuracy was for non-negative matrix factorization (NMF)-SPAER + Clinical and NMF-SPAER for maintaining thermal heterogeneity, leading to finding symptomatic cases with accuracies of 78.2% (74.3–82.5%) and 77.7% (70.9–82.1%), respectively. SPAER showed significant robustness when tested for additive Gaussian noise cases (3–20% noise), evaluated by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The results suggest high performance of SPAER for preserveing thermal heterogeneity, and it can be used as a noninvasive in vivo tool aiding CBE in the early detection of breast cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".