Using SCTP to hide latency in MPI programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A difficulty in using heterogeneous collections of geographically distributed machines across wide area networks for parallel computing is the huge variability in message latency that is orders of magnitude larger than parallel programs executing on dedicated systems. This variability is in part due to the underlying network bandwidth and latency which can vary dramatically according to network conditions. Although such an environment is not suitable for many message passing programs there are those programs that can take advantage of it. Using SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) for MPI, we show how to reduce the effect of latency on task farm programs to allow them to effectively execute in high latency environments. SCTP is a recently standardized transport level protocol that has a number of features that make it well-suited to MPI and our goal is to reduce the effect of latency on MPI programs in wide area networks. We take advantage of SCTP's improved congestion control as well as its ability to have multiple independent message streams over a single connection to eliminate the head of line blocking that can occur in TCP-based middleware. The use of streams required a novel use of MPI tags to identify independent streams rather than different types of messages. We describe the design of a task farm template that exploits streams, uses buffering and pipelining of task requests to improve its performance under network loss and variable latency. We use these techniques to improve the performance of two real-world MPI programs: a robust correlation matrix computation and mpiBLAST
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".