Hyperspectral Image Classification via Multi-Feature-Based Correlation Adaptive Representation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, representation-based methods have attracted more attention in the hyperspectral image (HSI) classification. Among them, sparse representation-based classifier (SRC) and collaborative representation-based classifier (CRC) are the two representative methods. However, SRC only focuses on sparsity but ignores the data correlation information. While CRC encourages grouping correlated variables together but lacks the ability of variable selection. As a result, SRC and CRC are incapable of producing satisfied performance. To address these issues, in this work, a correlation adaptive representation (CAR) is proposed, enabling a CAR-based classifier (CARC). Specifically, the proposed CARC is able to explore sparsity and data correlation information jointly, generating a novel representation model that is adaptive to the structure of the dictionary. To further exploit the correlation between the test samples and the training samples effectively, a distance-weighted Tikhonov regularization is integrated into the proposed CARC. Furthermore, to handle the small training sample problem in the HSI classification, a multi-feature correlation adaptive representation-based classifier (MFCARC) and MFCARC with Tikhonov regularization (MFCART) are presented to improve the classification performance by exploring the complementary information across multiple features. The experimental results show the superiority of the proposed methods over state-of-the-art algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".