MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142156238 · doi:10.1177/10422587211001806

Strategic Persistence in Family Business

2021· article· en· W3142156238 on OpenAlexaff
Hanqing Fang, James J. Chrisman, Daniel T. Holt

Bibliographic record

VenueEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFamily Business Performance and Succession
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamily businessCorporate governancePersistence (discontinuity)EntrepreneurshipSample (material)BusinessStrategic managementPanel dataDynamic capabilitiesIndustrial organizationMarketingManagementEconomicsFinanceEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a behavioral theory framework, we argue that family firms are more persistent (less likely to engage in the strategic renewal form of corporate entrepreneurship) in their strategic behaviors over time than nonfamily firms owing to their goals of maintaining family tradition and parsimony. We also argue that family firms controlled by founders or having a family member as Chairman or CEO are more likely to be persistent in their strategies than family firms with different governance structures. Panel regression based on a sample of 8,748 firm-year observations of S&P 1500 manufacturing firms from 1996 to 2013 support our hypotheses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntrepreneurship Theory and PracticeSame topicFamily Business Performance and SuccessionFrench-language works237,207