MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142156902 · doi:10.7202/1075468ar

COMPRENDRE LES DÉFIS CONJUGAUX DES PARENTS D’ENFANTS AYANT UN TSA : PROPOSITION D’UN MODÈLE ÉCOSYSTÉMIQUE

2021· article· fr· W3142156902 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marie Brien-Bérard, Catherine des Rivières‐Pigeon

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les parents d’enfants et d’adolescents ayant un TSA vivent de nombreux défis, notamment dans leur relation conjugale. L’analyse qualitative d’entrevues individuelles conduites auprès de 42 parents, a permis de révéler quatre défis conjugaux particuliers à l’autisme : une perception d’iniquité dans les contributions de chacun à la vie familiale, un décalage des perceptions et réactions entre les mères et les pères concernant l’autisme, une difficulté à avoir des moments de qualité en amoureux et des difficultés émotives et psychologiques. Le modèle écosystémique proposé permet de mieux comprendre ces défis et de les situer à l’intérieur du contexte familial et social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207