MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142171763 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2006.328430

A Frequency-Domain Approach to Registration Estimation in 3-D Space

2006· article· en· W3142171763 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - IEEE Instrumentation/Measurement Technology Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotation (mathematics)Translation (biology)Fourier transformPhase correlationAlgorithmComputer scienceFrequency domainTransformation (genetics)Iterative methodArtificial intelligenceIterative closest pointDiscrete Fourier transform (general)Computer visionShort-time Fourier transformMathematicsFourier analysisMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autonomous robotic systems require automatic registration of data collected by on-board sensors. Techniques requiring user intervention are unsuitable for autonomous robotic applications, while iterative-based techniques do not scale well as the dataset size increases, and additionally tend towards locally minimal solutions. To avoid the latter problem, an accurate initial estimation of the transformation is required for iterative algorithms to perform properly. The method presented in this paper does not require an initial estimation of the transformation, and avoids problems of the classical iterative techniques by employing the multi-dimensional Fourier transform, which decouples the estimation of rotational parameters from the estimation of the translational parameters. Using the magnitude of the Fourier transform, an axis of rotation is estimated by determining the line that contains the minimal energy differential between two rotated 3D images. By using a coarse to fine approach, the angle of rotation is determined from the minimal sum squared difference between the two rotated image. As the Fourier transform introduces hermitical symmetry in the rotation, the proper solution is identified through the use of a phase-correlation technique, and the estimate of translation is simultaneously obtained. Experimental results illustrate the accuracy that can be achieved by the proposed registration technique and performance is compared with that of the classical iterative closest point method

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it