Latent patterns of task-related functional connectivity in relation to regions of hyperactivation in individuals at risk of Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to assess how task-related hyperactivation relates to brain network dysfunction and memory performance in individuals at risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Eighty participants from the CIMA-Q cohort were included, of which 28 had subjective cognitive decline plus (SCD+), as they had memory complaints and worries in addition to a smaller hippocampal volume and/or an APOE4 allele, 26 had amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 26 were healthy controls without memory complaints. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation was measured during an object-location memory task. Seed-partial least square analyses (seed-PLS) were conducted in controls and in the SCD+/MCI groups to yield sets of orthogonal latent variables (LVs) assessing the triple association between: i) seed activity in brain regions found to be hyperactive in individuals at risk of AD (left hippocampus, left superior parietal lobule, right inferior temporal lobe), ii) latent patterns of whole-brain task-related activation, and iii) associative memory performance. Three LVs in the SCD+ and MCI groups (67.88% of total covariance explained) and two LVs in the controls (77.85% of total covariance explained) were significant. While controls and SCD+/MCI groups shared a common pattern of memory-related connectivity, patterns of hyperactivation-networks interactions were unique to the clinical groups. Interestingly, higher hippocampal connectivity was associated with poorer memory performance whereas higher neocortical connectivity predicted better memory performance in SCD+ and MCI groups. Our data provides empirical evidence that early dysfunction in brain activation and connectivity is present in the very early stages of AD and offers new insights on the relationship between functional brain alterations and memory performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.059 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".