MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142317587 · doi:10.18280/ria.350105

An Efficient and Scalable Heart Disease Diagnosis System with Attribute Impact Based Weights and Genetic Correlation Analysis

2021· article· en· W3142317587 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Srikanth Meda, Raveendra Babu Bhogapathi

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceData miningArtificial neural networkFuzzy logicMachine learningArtificial intelligenceScalabilityRough setFeature (linguistics)CorrelationFeature selectionDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuzzy neural network (FNN) is playing a vital role in processing of complex data mining applications like medical diagnosis, speech recognition, text processing, image processing etc. Fuzzy neural networks simulate the human brain functionality with fuzzy logic decision making capabilities, to achieve more accuracy in feature selection process of complex data mining applications. Today cardiovascular diseases become a serious global health issue and approximately more than 31% of all global deaths are happening due to cardiovascular diseases reported by WHO. In order to prevent and control the cardiovascular diseases, an efficient and accurate heart disease diagnosis system (HDDS) has to be designed with the state of the art feature based data classifiers. In recent, some research articles introduced HDDS using popular data mining techniques like FNN, but they are suffering from accuracy in allocation of attribute weights and attribute correlation analysis, pattern recognition, forecasting. To address the problems in designing the HDDS, in this paper, Fuzzy Neural Networks has been used with empowered input layer and hidden layers to achieve the high accuracy and performance, while processing the huge set of medical data records. We designed an Attribute Impact calculation procedure to assign the accurate weight values to the attributes and we proposed a Genetic Correlation Analysis algorithm to do correlation analysis which helps in improving the performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207