MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142421134 · doi:10.20286/jeas.v4i1.32

Waste minimization in solvent-based paint industries

2016· article· en· W3142421134 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Leila Ramezani

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Science and PVC
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHazardous wasteWaste managementReuseEnvironmental scienceWastewaterCleaner productionWaste treatmentMinificationPollutantSewage treatmentPollutionMobile incineratorMunicipal solid wasteWaste collectionEngineeringChemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solvent-base paint industries moreover to hazardous solid wastes, volatile organic compounds and air emissions produce significant amount of wastewater  containing organic solvents which are classified as hazardous  wastes due to toxicity, ignitability or both. These wastes have adverse impacts on human health and natural ecosystems and the cost of its treatment and safe disposal is high. Implementing of waste minimization plans is the only solution which minimizes waste generation and environment pollution meanwhile reduces   both environmental pollutants treatment costs and surcharges of  disobeying  environmental requirements. The aim of this paper was study of waste minimization methods and techniques in solvent-base paint industries. According this aim, type of wastes, its sources and waste minimization options in the plants were studied. Researches done in this study showed that the relative ease of wastewater solvent recycling and the high thermal content of organic solvent wastes suggests different   waste minimization options such as: source reduction, recovery, recycle and reuse. Successful implementation of the plan depends on patronage and commitment of plant manager, responsibility and active partnership of all of personnel in accomplishing to waste minimization goals. Keywords: Paint, Recycle , Reuse, Source reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova Journal of Engineering and Applied SciencesSame topicPolymer Science and PVCFrench-language works237,207