MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142425788

4 - Déroulement de phase : application à la correction de distorsions géométriques en IRM

2000· article· fr· W3142425788 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Desvignes, Langlois, Constans

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Classification of discontinuitiesArtificial intelligenceInverse synthetic aperture radarComputer visionSynthetic aperture radarAlgorithmRadar imagingMathematicsRadarTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic Resonance Imaging has entered clinical practice about fifteen years ago, and has become one of the most widely used imaging modality. MRI suffers from important geometric distortions, leading to pixel shifts and intensity variations in the acquired images. Correction of these distortions is clearly required in stereotactic surgery using frame-based registrations or neuro-navigation. These distortions can be corrected using the phase of signal or image. However, as in Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar (ISAR), the phase of the signal is obtained modulo 2 π. The goal of Phase unwrapping is to retrieve the initial phase of the signal. After a brief summary of related works and applications mainly using ISAR data, this paper presents a new algorithm for phase unwrapping. This algorithm is fast, robust to noise and takes into account the discontinuities of the acquired object. It is based upon the notion of homogeneous region. This homogeneity is defined by phase jumps and no parameters have to be determined a priori. Experiments on noisy phantoms exhibit good robustness to noise. An application to the correction of MRI of the head is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAdvanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207