MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142481651 · doi:10.1093/europace/euw028

Surgical ablation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: impact of lesion set and surgical techniques on long-term success

2016· letter· en· W3142481651 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Jacques, François Philippon

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAblationSurgeryMitral valveLesionMitral valve replacementCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study by Gelsomino et al. published in December 2015 in the Europace underlines the importance of technical elements on which we want to comment.1 First, it underlines the importance of biatrial ablation lesion sets to obtain clinical success with modified Maze procedures. This is in complete concordance with the fundamental work of Cox et al. 2 One cannot expect to replicate such a comprehensive pathophysiological management with only half of the work.3 The authors are right in stating the obvious. Second, regarding the mitral isthmus, the manuscript discusses the …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207