ID-Seg: An Accurate and Reliable Infant Deep learning Segmentation Framework for Limbic Structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Early postnatal period brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming an important approach to measure the impact of prenatal exposures on neurodevelopment and to investigate early biomarkers for risk. Among brain structures, Limbic structures are particular of interest in psychiatric disorder-related research. However, despite the promise of infant neuroimaging and the success of initial infant MRI studies, assessing limbic regions’ structure and function remains a significant challenge due to low inter-regional intensity contrast and high curvature (e.g., hippocampus). In addition, the agreement between existing automatic techniques and manual segmentation remains either untested or insufficient, particularly for the amygdala and hippocampus. In this work, we developed an accurate (based on three segmentation evaluation metrics), reliable and efficient infant deep learning segmentation framework (ID-Seg) to address the aforementioned challenges. Specifically, we leveraged a large dataset of 473 infant MRI scans to train ID-Seg and rigorously evaluated ID-Seg’s performance on internal and external datasets with manual segmentations. Compared with a state-of-the-art segmentation pipeline, we demonstrated that ID-Seg significantly improved the segmentation accuracy of limbic structures (hippocampus and amygdala) in newborn infants. Moreover, in a medium-size dataset, we found that ID-Seg-derived morphometric measures yield strong brain-behavior associations. As such, our ID-Seg may improve our capacity and efficiency to measure MRI-based brain features relevant to neuropsychological development and ultimately advance the success of quantitative analyses on large-scale datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".