MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of approach flow conditions on the unsteady three-dimensional wake structure of a square-back Ahmed body

2021· article· en· W3142624592 on OpenAlexafffund
Nam Lyong Kang, Ebenezer E. Essel, Vesselina Roussinova, Ram Balachandar

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Fluids · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWakeMechanicsTurbulencePhysicsPlane (geometry)Boundary layerFlow (mathematics)AsymmetryMomentum (technical analysis)Square (algebra)GeometryClassical mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the effects of approach flow conditions (uniform flow (UF): Case A and thick turbulent boundary layer (TBL): Case B) on the unsteady three-dimensional wake characteristics and bimodality of a square back Ahmed body. Using improved delayed detached eddy simulations we show that TBL induces a much higher ground clearance momentum deficit than UF, which significantly alters wake asymmetry orientation in the wall-normal plane and completely suppresses bimodal wake behavior in the spanwise plane. Both time-averaged and time-resolved turbulence statistics are used to explore the differences between the wake structure of the Ahmed body subject to the two approach flow conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review FluidsSame topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207