MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142666957 · doi:10.1109/wsc.2007.4419839

Construction noise prediction and barrier optimization using special purpose simulation

2007· article· en· W3142666957 on OpenAlexaff
Anupama Gannoruwa, Janaka Y. Ruwanpura

Bibliographic record

Venue2007 Winter Simulation Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise barrierNoise (video)Noise controlPlan (archaeology)Computer scienceSimulation softwareSoftwarePoint (geometry)Noise pollutionControl (management)Simulation modelingRoadway noiseSystems engineeringSimulationIndustrial engineeringConstruction engineeringTransport engineeringEngineeringNoise reductionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Construction projects produce serious environmental pollution and great annoyance to the neighbouring community due to construction noise. This paper presents an application of the special purpose simulation (SPS) language using Simphony software to predict the noise levels generated by construction equipment, tools and machinery at a given reception point for a certain barrier length, as well as the related cost of the barrier wall. To illustrate an application of the developed model, an example has been developed for different noise sources and different activities. The information obtained from the simulation model output will help to utilize the model as a planning tool for optimizing the length and location of noise barriers around a construction site. The tool can be useful for a contractor to develop a noise-control plan using mitigation measures that are acceptable to the owner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2007 Winter Simulation ConferenceSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207