MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142698971 · doi:10.7282/t3qz2916

Postrift deformation of the Scotian basin, offshore Nova Scotia and Newfoundland, Canada

2012· article· en· W3142698971 on OpenAlex
etikha etikha

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaGeologySubmarine pipelineReflection (computer programming)Structural basinPaleontologySeismologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Scotian basin is a postrift basin on the passive margin of eastern North America. Using 2D and 3D seismic data, located in the Laurentian and Penobscot study areas, respectively, I have identified three types of deformation affecting Cretaceous through Recent strata: reactivation of basement-involved faults during both extensional and contractional deformation, detached extension and shortening, and deformation associated with lithological changes; salt movement accompanied the first two types of deformation. Two angular unconformities bound the section, indicating two notable episodes of uplift and erosion first during the earliest Cretaceous and second during the late Cenozoic. An anomalous NW-trending anticline beneath the eastern Laurentian Channel resulted from reactivation of deep-seated faults. Faults with reverse separation formed beneath the anticline. Miocene channels are deflected from the anticline, whereas Pliocene-Pleistocene channels directly overlie the anticline, suggesting that the anticline was active during Miocene time. The anticline and subsidiary structures are subparallel to modeled seafloor displacement from the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake. The faults and folds indicate widespread, long-lived deformation. Extensional reactivation of deep-seated faults resulted in shallow faults with normal separation that were active from Cretaceous through middle Cenozoic time. During late Cenozoic time, deformation changed and was dominated by shortening that coincided with the formation of the late Cenozoic angular unconformity. The most recent phase of deformation, which produced the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake, involves NE-SW to NNW-SSE shortening. Faults associated with detached extension were active during the Early Cretaceous and again during the late Cenozoic (Miocene). Detached shortening, at least locally, occurred during Late Cretaceous time. In the Penobscot study area, faults have reverse separation at depth and normal separation at shallow levels. The faults had reverse separation during early Early Cretaceous time. An offset channel suggests that one fault had normal slip during Late Cretaceous through early Cenozoic time. Episodic normal faulting during Late Cretaceous time and polygonal faults with a preferred orientation indicate NW-SE extension during Late Cretaceous to early Cenozoic time. Polygonal faults, present in both study areas, resulted from deformation associated with lithological changes. They were active during Late Cretaceous to early Cenozoic time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it