ISUE AKSESIBILITAS DAN PENGEMBANGAN WILAYAH SEBAGAI KRITERIA PENENTU PRIORITAS PENINGKATAN JALAN DI KABUPATEN PIDIE JAYA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Dinas Pekerjaan Umum (PU) Kabupaten Pidie Jaya pada tahun 2020 mengajukan usulan peningkatan ruas jalan sebanyak 5 ruas kepada Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat (PUPR) melalui Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK) yang akan dilaksanakan pada tahun 2021. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis urutan prioritas peningkatan ruas jalan di Kabupaten Pidie Jaya berdasarkan criteria aksesibilitas dan pengembangan wilayah. Data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini berupa data primer dan data sekunder. Metode pengumpulan data primer menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif melalui kuesioner dan data sekunder didapatkan melalui instansi Pemerintah Kabupaten Pidie Jaya. Penetapan responden pada penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purposive sampling, dan ditetapkan sebanyak 5 responden, yaitu KepalaBidang Bina Marga Dinas PU Kabupaten Pidie Jaya, Kepala Bidang Perencanaan Sarana dan Prasarana Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Bappeda) Kabupaten Pidie Jaya, Kepala Bidang Perhubungan Jalur Darat Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Pidie Jaya, Anggota Komisi D Bidang Pembangunan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Kabupaten (DPRK) Pidie Jaya, dan Akademisi Universitas Syiah Kuala. Kriteria aksesibilitas dan pengembangan wilayah akan menjadi pertimbangan dalam menentukan urutan prioritas 5 (lima) alternativ ruas jalan yang akan ditingkatkan. Untuk menentukan bobot kriteria dan bobot alternative berpasangan digunakan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), selanjutnya persamaan matematika digunakan untuk mendapatkan urutan prioritas peningkatan jalan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa criteria aksesibilitas lebih dominan. Urutan prioritas peningkatan ruas jalan berdasarkan criteria aksesibilitas dan pengembangan wilayah menunjukkan bahwa alternatif Jalan Simpang Pertanian- Cot Trieng - Rungkom sebagai prioritas pertama, dan alternatif Jalan Trienggadeng - Panton Beurasan-Cubo sebagai prioritas kedua. Kata kunci: prioritas, jalan,kriteria, aksesibilitas, pengembangan wilayah Abstract The Public Works Office (PekerjaanUmum (PU)) of Pidie Jaya Regency in 2020 has submitted a proposal to increase the road section of 5 sections to the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) through a Special Allocation Fund (DAK), which will be implemented in 2021. The purpose of this study is to analyze the priority order of segment improvement. Roads in Pidie Jaya Regency based on accessibility criteria and regional development. The data used in this study are primary data and secondary data. The primary data method used a quantitative approach to a questionnaire and the data were obtained through the Pidie Jaya district government agencies. Determination of respondents in this study using purposive sampling technique, and determined as many as 5 respondents, namely the Head of Bina Marga Division of the Public Works Agency of Pidie Jaya Regency, Head of the Planning for Facilities and Infrastructure of the Regional Development Planning Agency (Bappeda), Pidie Jaya Regency, Head of the Landline Transportation Department Pidie Jaya District Transportation, Members of Commission D for the Development Sector of the District People's Representative Council (DPRK) Pidie Jaya, and academics at Syiah Kuala University. The criteria for accessibility and regional development will be considered in determining the priority order of 5 (five) alternative roads to be improved. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used to determine the criteria weights and the paired alternative weights. Mathematical equations are used to obtain the priority order of road improvement. Based on the results of data analysis, it shows that the accessibility criteria are more dominant. The order of priority for road improvement based on accessibility criteria and regional development shows that the alternative for the SimpangPertanian - Cot Trieng - Rungkom Road is the first priority, and the Trienggadeng - Panton Beurasan - Cubo road alternative is the second priority. Keywords: priority,road, criteria, accessibility, regional development
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it