MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142903789 · doi:10.1287/opre.2021.0034

Strong Optimal Classification Trees

2024· article· en· W3142903789 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Data Classification
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)HeuristicComputer scienceMathematical optimizationInteger (computer science)Decision treeMachine learningRevenueInteger programmingRangingArtificial intelligenceTree (set theory)Sample (material)Relaxation (psychology)Operations researchMathematicsStatisticsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Decision trees are among the most interpretable and popular machine learning models that are used routinely in applications ranging from revenue management to medicine. Traditional heuristic methods, although fast, lack modeling flexibility for incorporating constraints such as fairness and do not guarantee optimality. Recent efforts aim to overcome these limitations using mixed-integer optimization (MIO) for better modeling flexibility and optimality, but speed remains an issue. In “Strong Optimal Classification Trees,” Aghaei, Gómez, and Vayanos use integer optimization and polyhedral theory to create an MIO-based formulation with a strong LO relaxation resulting in a 29% speed-up in training time compared with state-of-the-art MIO-based formulations, as well as up to an 8% improvement in out-of-sample accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.445
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it