Factors influencing English Language Learners＇ performance on the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
本研究调查了英语学习者个体特点对其在安大略省中学读写测试（OSSLT）成绩的潜在影响。研究者收集了参加OSSLT考试学生的个体因素和与其父母受教育程度、社会经济地位相关的学校因素，将这些因素和学生OSSLT考试成绩（N=4311）进行相关性分析。研究变量包括：课后读写活动、家庭语言使用和该校学生家庭平均经济社会地位。分析结果体现了考试成绩和个体因素以及学校因素的相关性。具体而言，与高分相关的读写活动包括互联网使用、文学和非小说类的阅读；父母受教育水平（而非收入水平）是一项独立的积极预测指标，该指标对OSSLT学生阅读和写作成绩的影响因素分别占到了20％和9％。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".