MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142983592

2 - Utilisation de la transformée de Fourier-Mellin pour la reconnaissance de formes multi-orientées et multi-échelles : application à l'analyse automatique de documents techniques

2001· article· fr· W3142983592 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adam Adam, Ogier, Cariou, Mullot, Gardes, Lecourtier

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Fourier transformInvariant (physics)Set (abstract data type)Mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an original methodology which allows the detection and the recognition of multi-oriented and multiscaled patterns. The supports on which the method is applied are technical documents representing the network of the French Telephone operator France Telecom. The adopted technique, based on the Fourier-Mellin Transform (FMT) is integrated in a global strategy that solves ambiguous situations, through the providing of contextual information. The strategy which is applied to solve the character and symbol classification problem can be divided into two stages. The first one consists in computing a set of invariant descriptors for each isolated pattern belonging to a characters layer detected thanks to a connected components extractor. The second stage, based on a filtering scheme, consists in detecting and recognising the shapes which are either interconnected or connected to any other object. The results of the application of this technique are very encouraging since the classification rate reaches excellent scores in comparison with classical techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207