MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143231888

Fire cycle of the Canada's boreal region and its potential response to global change

2007· article· en· W3143231888 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhang, Quan-fa, Chen, Wenjun

Bibliographic record

Venue林业研究:英文版 · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorealClimate changeGlobal changeClimatologyGeographyMeteorologyEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyGeologyOceanographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

火的相互作用骑车,植物硬币的繁殖特征能决定一处风景的植被分发模式。在加拿大的北方的区域,火在小冰川期前骑车(c。1850 年代) 以后从 30-130 年和 25-234 年直到解决时期(c。1930 年代) 什么时候更长发射周期,响应气候变迁和人的干扰发生了。分析显示火周期与生长期(4 月 10 月) 被相关从 1961-1990 正常的温度和降水离开,由区域变化。假设野火将在过去的世纪,用气候变迁情形 CGCM1 的一个评价, CGCM2 和 HadCM2 期间对类似于方式的温暖的未来作出回应显示周期将在西方泰加森林盾转移到 80-140 年的一个范围的火,为北方的盾和东方泰加森林防护的东方的超过 700 年,和为在 2050 的北方的平原的 300-400 年。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue林业研究:英文版Same topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207