MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143359878

4 - La transformation de Fisz pour l'estimation de l'image des intensités d'un bruit Poissonien dans le domaine des ondelettes

2004· article· fr· W3143359878 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fadili, Mathieu, Desvignes

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletMathematicsEstimatorTransformation (genetics)Bayesian probabilityApplied mathematicsAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceStatisticsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel wavelet-based Poisson-intensity estimator of images is presented. This method is based on the asymptotic normality of a certain function of the Haar wavelet and scaling coefficients called the Fisz transformation. Some asymptotic results such as normality and decorrelation of the transformed image samples are extended to the 2D case. This Fisz-transformed image is then treated as if it was independent and gaussian variables. Then we apply a novel Bayesian denoiser that we have recently developed. In the latter, a prior model is imposed on the wavelet coefficients designed to capture the sparseness of the wavelet expansion. Seeking probability models for the marginal densities of the wavelet coefficients, the new family of Bessel K forms densities are shown to fit very well to the observed histograms. Exploiting this prior, we designed a Bayesian nonlinear denoiser and a closed-form for its expression was derived. Our Fisz-transformation based Bayesian denoiser compares very favorably to variance stabilizing transformation methods in both smooth and piece-wise constant intensities. It clearly outperforms the other denoising methods especially in the low-count setting. Combining the Fisz transform and the BKF Bayesian denoiser yields the best performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207