MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143450461 · doi:10.1145/1151954.1067523

Student communication challenges in distributed software engineering environments

2005· article· en· W3143450461 on OpenAlexaff
Denise M. Woit, Kolbein Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGCSE Bulletin · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsSeneca PolytechnicToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFace (sociological concept)SoftwareHuman–computer interactionPopulationDistributed learningWork (physics)Software engineeringMultimediaPsychologyEngineeringPedagogyProgramming languageSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate Non-Face-to-Face (NFtF) distributed collaboration in a population for which technology poses no barrier-students involved in distributed software engineering via Distance Learning. Our study finds students believe themselves significantly less effective in this environment because of lack of traditional non-verbal cues, in partial agreement with previous work. Based on our results, we identify potential problems and present activities to mitigate these so that NFtF oriented interactions may be made more effective for this group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGCSE BulletinSame topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207