Modeling and Solution of Vehicle Routing Problem with Grey Time Windows and Multiobjective Constraints
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose. In order to study the impact of grey delivery time uncertainty on customer satisfaction and delivery costs, a vehicle routing problem with grey delivery time windows and multiobjective constraints is defined. Method. The paper first defines the uncertainty of the delivery vehicle’s arrival time to the customer as grey uncertainty and then whitens the grey time windows; at the same time, the customer’s hard time windows is expanded into a soft time windows to measure customer satisfaction when the vehicle arrives. Experiment. In order to verify the validity of the established model, numerical experiments are carried out in two groups based on the Solomon example, and the solution is solved based on the improved quantum evolution algorithm. Analysis. Distribution cost fluctuations and customer satisfaction fluctuations with grey time windows are relatively small; under different satisfaction threshold conditions, the distribution cost is increased gently with the satisfaction threshold. Conclusion. The grey delivery time windows have certain advantages in solving the random travel time vehicle routing problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it