MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143787245

Construction and Application of Subgenomic Replicon Vectors of Japanese Encephalitis Virus

2007· article· en· W3143787245 on OpenAlexaff
Yongxin Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueBingdu xuebao · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepliconSubgenomic mRNABiologyInternal ribosome entry siteVirologyRNAVirusGreen fluorescent proteinMolecular biologyTransfectionReporter geneJapanese encephalitisAlphavirusGeneGene expressionPlasmidRibosomeGeneticsEncephalitis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the infectious clone of JEV vaccine SA14-14-2,the subgenomic replicons pCTCJEV,pCTMJEV with large deletions in the structural region were constructed.Then they were transfected into BHK21 cell,the RNA replication of JEV subgenome can be monitored by RT-PCR and the non-structural protein can be found expressed in the cell by IFA.To explore the possibility of using a reporter gene assay to monitor synthesis of the positivestrand and the negative-strand JEV RNA,we inserted an enhanced green fluorescence protein(EGFP) gene into the 3′-UTR of pCTCJEV,pCTMJEV under the control of the internal ribosomal entry site(IRES) of encephalomyelocarditis virus RNA.After transfection,the EGFP fluorescence could be seen under the fluorescence microscope 1 day later,and maintained for more than a week with no apparent cytopathic effect.The constructed JEV replicons would provide valuable tools to provide a possible vector for a long-lasting RNA virus expression system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBingdu xuebaoSame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207