MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geophysical research at the Revda intersection of the Serov-Mauk regional fault

2021· article· en· W3143806847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. A. Davydov

Bibliographic record

VenueIzvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Gornyi zhurnal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExploration geophysicsGeologyFault (geology)GeophysicsDepth soundingGradiometerTectonicsGeophysical surveyProspectingSeismologyMagnetometerRemote sensingMagnetic fieldMining engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research aim is to study the characteristic features of geophysical fields over the main geological structures in the zone of influence of the Serov-Mauk regional fault in the Middle Urals. Methodology. Electromagnetic studies included an express version of audiomagnetotelluric sounding (AMT) with a broadband OMAR-2m receiver (Institute of Geophysics UB RAS, Ekaterinburg). Office processing is based on obtaining frequency spectra of impedance using fast Fourier transform, and their transformation into deep sections of electrophysical parameters of the medium. Magnetic prospecting was carried out using GEM GSM-19T proton magnetometer (GEM Systems, Canada). Gamma-field survey was carried out with a survey radiometer SRP-68-01 (Electron, Zhovti Vody). Results. Based on observation processing results, high-quality sections of electrical resistivity and effective longitudinal conductivity were constructed on the parametric profile, as well as graphs of magnetic and radiation fields. The studies revealed features of change in the electrophysical parameters and potential fields over various geological structures of the near-contact fault zone. Summary. The signs of the main geologic features border lines were identified by changes in physical properties. The lithological and tectonic boundaries have been identified of a complex rock assemblage adjacent to the regional fault according to the characteristic anomalies of geophysical parameters. Geophysical survey results comply with the real geological conditions of the study area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIzvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii Gornyi zhurnalSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207