MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143898298 · doi:10.1080/19427867.2021.1908490

Developing extended trajectory database for heterogeneous traffic like NGSIM database

2021· article· en· W3143898298 on OpenAlexaff
Narayana Raju, Shriniwas Arkatkar, Said M. Easa, Gaurang Joshi

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersFederal Highway Administration
KeywordsTrajectoryImage stitchingDatabaseComputer scienceSoftware deploymentData miningAutomationTraffic flow (computer networking)Real-time computingEngineeringComputer networkArtificial intelligenceSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work introduced a framework of developing comprehensive extended vehicular trajectory data under heterogeneous non-lane-based traffic conditions like the NGSIM datasets in the United States. Due to the absence of automation and instrumentation, and even the lack of sensor deployment on roads in developing economies like India, it is even more challenging to study driver behavior. A new stitching-based algorithm was used for developing the extended trajectory database for three traffic-flow levels on a 535-m long section of an urban arterial. The algorithm was used to stitch the trajectory data over the segments such that the subject vehicle with continuous trajectory data points over the entire study stretch. The developed framework is a novel tool for establishing a trajectory dataset for mixed traffic, it should be of interest to researchers in developing and developed countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation LettersSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207