MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Resource Management in Softwarized Networks

2022· article· en· W3144080483 on OpenAlexaff
Shihabur Rahman Chowdhury, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

VenueNOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork managementScalabilityNetwork architectureComputer networkSoftware-defined networkingResource management (computing)Distributed computingResource allocationNetwork monitoringSurvivability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Communication networks are undergoing a major transformation through softwarization, which is changing the way networks are designed, operated, and managed. The enhanced programmability enabled by softwarization creates unique opportunities for adapting network function and resources in support of applications and users with diverse requirements. To effectively leverage the flexibility provided by network softwarization and realize its full potential, it is of paramount importance to devise proper mechanisms for allocating resources to different applications and users and for monitoring their usage over time. The overarching goal of this dissertation is to advance state-of-the-art in how resources are allocated and monitored and build the foundation for effective resource management in softwarized networks. Specifically, we address four resource management challenges in all three key enablers of network softwarization. First, we challenge the current practice of realizing network services with monolithic software network functions and propose a microservice-based disaggregated architecture enabling finer-grained resource allocation and scaling. Then, we devise optimal solutions and scalable heuristics for establishing virtual networks with guaranteed bandwidth and guaranteed survivability against failures in multi-layer IP-over-Optical and single-layer IP substrate networks, respectively. Finally, we propose adaptive sampling mechanisms for balancing the overhead of softwarized network monitoring and the accuracy of the network view constructed from monitoring data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNOMS 2022-2022 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management SymposiumSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207