MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3144134537 · doi:10.47912/jscdm.29

Electronic Data Capture-Selecting an EDC System

2020· article· en· W3144134537 on OpenAlexaff
Maxine Pestronk, Derek Johnson, Muthamma Muthanna, Olivia Montaño, Denise Redkar-Brown, Ralph Russo, Shweta Kerkar, David Eade

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Society for Clinical Data Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaInflamax Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronic data captureComputer scienceProcess (computing)Process managementSelection (genetic algorithm)Key (lock)Automatic identification and data captureSoftwareElectronic dataSystems engineeringSoftware engineeringData collectionDatabaseEngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Web-based Electronic data capture (EDC) has become the preferred method for capture of key-entered data in clinical studies. This chapter reviews the considerations for selecting an EDC system including evaluation of systems and vendors, user requirements, an process change, as well as initial implementation of systems within organizations. The goal of system selection is to assure that organizational needs are identified and documented and ultimately that the desired functionality is available and appropriately supports clinical studies conducted by the organization. Multiple roles on study teams use the EDC system and should be involved in software selection and initial implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.372
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.045 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Society for Clinical Data ManagementSame topicBig Data and Business IntelligenceFrench-language works237,207