A High-Coverage Camera Assisted Received Signal Strength Ratio Algorithm for Indoor Visible Light Positioning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high-coverage algorithm termed enhanced camera assisted received signal strength ratio (eCA-RSSR) positioning algorithm is proposed for visible light positioning (VLP) systems. The basic idea of eCA-RSSR is to utilize visual information captured by the camera to estimate first the incidence angles of visible lights. Based on the incidence angles, eCA-RSSR utilizes the received signal strength ratio (RSSR) calculated by the photodiode (PD) to estimate the ratios of the distances between the LEDs and the receiver. Based on an Euclidean plane geometry theorem, eCA-RSSR transforms the ratios of the distances into the absolute values. In this way, eCA-RSSR only requires three LEDs for both orientation-free 2D and 3D positioning, implying that eCA-RSSR can achieve high coverage. Based on the absolute values of the distances, the linear least square method is employed to estimate the position of the receiver. Therefore, for the receiver having a small distance between the PD and the camera, the accuracy of eCA-RSSR does not depend on the starting values of the non-linear least square method and the complexity of eCA-RSSR is low. Furthermore, since the distance between the PD and camera can significantly affect the performance of eCA-RSSR, we further propose a compensation algorithm for eCA-RSSR based on the single-view geometry. Experiment results show that positioning errors of less than five centimeters is achievable for eCA-RSSR. Simulation results show that eCA-RSSR can achieve 80th percentile accuracy of about four centimeters and can improve the coverage ratio at low cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".