Call for Papers: Special Issue of Earth, Planets and Space (EPS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies on the characteristics and origin of the Earth’s magnetic field have been developing dramatically. In particular, the recent progress of studies on generation mechanisms of the geomagnetic field through dynamo simulations and physical properties of core material is remarkable. Advances in rock magnetism and paleomagnetism have resulted in an increasing abundance of valuable information on the geomagnetic field in the past. These developments have enabled us to combine observational and theoretical results. They also have enabled us to discuss a possible relation between the geomagnetic field, the Earth’s orbital elements and paleoclimate. Geomagnetism is no longer an isolated research field, but a multidisciplinary endeavor. Masaru Kono, who has just recently retired, has made significant contributions to this integrated field—from geodynamo theory to rock magnetism. To commemorate his achievements, an international session was held during the Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2006 on “Perspectives of Geomagnetism: Geodynamo, Paleomagnetism, and Rock Magnetism—Tribute to Masaru Kono—(conveners: Toshitsugu Yamazaki, Tadahiro Hatakeyama, Masaki Matsushima, and Yozo Hamano)”. In view of the great success of the session, we propose a proceeding of the international session as a special issue of Earth Planets, and Space. The publication, however, will not be limited to papers presented in the session and, therefore, we encourage contributions from everyone interested. Contributors to this special issue should submit their papers to the EPS editorial office either by post or by e-mail (eps@terrapub.co.jp), following the instructions for regular EPS submission. For details, please visit the following web page:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.505 | 0.396 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".