Impact of Nearby Adiabatic and Isothermal Barriers on the Thermal Characteristics of a Vertically Oriented Pot-core Magnetic Component
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coupled problem of estimating the temperature rise due to losses in a vertically oriented magnetic component is considered. The principle contributions in this paper are two-fold: (i) coupling between the losses and thermal problems for the component is addressed taking into account the effects of nearby barriers, (ii) the complication that the convection coefficient is not known accurately is overcome by means of solving a coupled electro-thermal - air flow problem in order to characterize heat transfer to the ambient surroundings. It is shown that the coupling between loss and temperature in the magnetic material is weak since the deviation in temperature is not more than 13% at worst if the loss is considered constant. Additionally, the convection coefficients of the core top and side surfaces are shown not to be significantly influenced by the boundary condition imposed on the obstacle. The boundary conditions substantially change the temperature by introducing an additional path for heat transfer. Furthermore, the contribution of radiation is found to be roughly 50% of the total loss regardless of the barrier distance, height and boundary condition
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".