MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3144300192 · doi:10.1101/2021.04.07.438883

An inventory of early branch points in microbial phosphonate biosynthesis

2021· preprint· en· W3144300192 on OpenAlexafffund
Siwei Li, Geoff P. Horsman

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMutaseBiosynthesisPhosphonateGeneOperonBiologyHorizontal gene transferEnzymeBiochemistryGenomeChemistryStereochemistryGeneticsEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microbial phosphonate biosynthetic machinery has been identified in ~5% of bacterial genomes and encodes natural products like fosfomycin as well as cell surface decorations. Almost all biological phosphonates originate from the rearrangement of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to phosphonopyruvate (PnPy) catalyzed by PEP mutase (Ppm), and PnPy is often converted to phosphonoacetaldehyde (PnAA) by PnPy decarboxylase (Ppd). Seven enzymes are known or likely to act on either PnPy or PnAA as early branch points en route to diverse biosynthetic outcomes, and these enzymes may be broadly classified into three reaction types: hydride transfer, aminotransfer, and carbon-carbon bond formation. However, the relative abundance of these branch points in microbial phosphonate biosynthesis is unknown. Also unknown is the proportion of ppm -containing gene neighborhoods encoding new branch point enzymes and potentially novel phosphonates. In this study we computationally sorted 434 ppm -containing gene neighborhoods based on these seven branch point enzymes. Unsurprisingly, the majority (56%) of these pathways encode for production of the common naturally occurring compound 2-aminoethylphosphonate (AEP) or a hydroxylated derivative. The next most abundant genetically encoded intermediates were phosphonoalanine (PnAla, 9.2%), 2-hydroxyethylphosphonate (HEP, 8.5%), and phosphonoacetate (PnAc, 6%). Significantly, about 13% of the gene neighborhoods could not be assigned to any of the seven branch points and may encode novel phosphonates. Sequence similarity network analysis revealed families of unusual gene neighborhoods including possible production of phosphonoacrylate and phosphonofructose, the apparent biosynthetic use of the C-P lyase operon, and a virus-encoded phosphonate. Overall, these results highlight the utility of branch point inventories to identify novel gene neighborhoods and guide future phosphonate discovery efforts. IMPACT STATEMENT Microbially-produced phosphonates are relatively rare and underexplored but include medically and agriculturally important molecules like fosfomycin and phosphinothricin, respectively. Because a single enzyme called phosphoenolpyruvate mutase (Ppm) inititates almost all phosphonate production, the composition of the ‘gene neighborhood’ surrounding a Ppm-encoding gene can inform hypotheses regarding the chemical output of this chromosomal region. After the initial Ppm-catalyzed reaction there are only a limited set of subsequently acting enzymes, or ‘branch points’, to direct these early-stage phosphonates to alternate chemical fates. However, the relative abundance of different branch points – or the existence of new ones – has not been evaluated. This study provides just such a ‘branch point inventory’ to determine relative proportions of known branch points and assess the diversity within each branch point. Significantly, this study suggests that a significant proportion (~13%) of gene neighborhoods do not fit into known branch points and therefore may be fertile hunting grounds for new phosphonate biochemistry. Data Summary Supporting information is available at Scholars Portal Dataverse ( https://dataverse.scholarsportal.info/ ) with DOI 10.5683/SP2/T33ZP6. This includes scripts and the network data for visualizing in BiG-SCAPE and Cytoscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207