MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3144381345 · doi:10.22437/pdpd.v7i2.6890

Analisis ketimpangan pendapatan pedagang kaki lima di Kota Kuala Tungkal

2018· article· en· W3144381345 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Jurnal Perspektif Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Daerah · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGini coefficientQuarter (Canadian coin)InequalityDemographic economicsLorenz curveCapital (architecture)GeographyEconomicsSocioeconomicsEconomic inequalityMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to analyze the socio-economic characteristics and inequality of income of street vendors in Kuala Tungkal City. The data used is sourced from surveys at street vendors. Data were analyzed descriptively and used the gini coefficient and lorentz curve. The results of the study found that street vendors in Kuala Tungkal City were characterized by: 1) Dominated by men with the highest proportion of ages between 26 - 45 years. Merchant education is relatively varied ranging from never going to school to graduating from high school. More than two thirds of them are married with the number of family dependents dominated by 1-4 people. In terms of business location, almost three-quarters of them operate in the market area and only about a quarter of them are trying along the main road. The capital of street vendors in the city of Kuala Tungkal is relatively varied from Rp. 50,000 to over Rp. 1,000,000, with more than half having the same capital or less than Rp. 550,000. Furthermore, in terms of income, most street vendors have an income of Rp. 151,000 - 250,000; 2) Using the method of class three class, the inequality of income of street vendors in the low category with a gini ratio of 0.22772. Furthermore, using the class five class method, the inequality of income of street vendors is also in the low category with a gini ratio of 0.2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it